 |
. . .
The Offshore
Pirate Forts & Sealand
|
|
|
|
|
The
offshore Maunsell forts, or towers, which interested the pirate
radio operators of the Sixties, were originally World War
II military facilities built to protect the coastal sea lanes
and were essentially of two designs.
< click
to see original condition >
|
|
| ss |
Red
Sands, Shivering
Sands and Great
Nore were Army constructed, originally consisting of seven
separate towers, each set on four concrete legs supporting a
steel structure 100ft above sea level and connected by narrow
catwalks. The towers were towed out on specially constructed
barges, two at a time, and set into the sea bed. Red
Sands was put in place between July 23rd and September 23rd
1943 at 51.28.62 North 0.59.60 East and Shivering Sands between
September 18th and December 13th 1943 at 51.29.95 North 1.04.48
East.
Great Nore tower had been completely uninhabitable since the
mid-fifties and was demolished in 1958 as it was blocking the
main approach to the Thames ports. Both
types were designed to house various gun installations ( quite
visible on many pictures ) to combat the twin threats of enemy
aircraft and E-boats. |

Station Map
|
|

They
were all designed by Guy A.Maunsell, who submitted many designs to
the military for consideration, and were constructed by Holloway Brothers
at Gravesend in Kent. The Army Forts were constructed in 1942 subsequent
to the successful construction and deployment of the Navy forts. Each
Army construction followed the same basic design, comprising of a
Bofors gun tower, a control tower, four AA gun towers and a searchlight
tower which were arranged with the control tower at the centre, the
Bofors and AA towers arranged in a semi-circular fashion around it
with the searchlight tower being positioned further away but still
linked directly to the control tower via a high level walkway.
It is worth noting that a great variety of sea forts were constructed
around the UK during WW2 such as the Solent forts, typified by
Horse
Sand Fort, but did not figure significantly in pirate radio activities
either due to location (broadcast range) or non-existence - most
were destroyed immediately after the war as they interfered with shipping
lanes. Had they survived, it would have been interesting to see whether
they would have attracted the interest of would-be radio stations.
The attraction of the Thames forts was, of course, that they still
existed and were perceived to be outside British territorial limits.
|
The
original navy forts weighed 4500 tonnes and their armament
consisted of two 4.5" guns mounted on the main decks, four
Lewis machine guns and two Bofors 40mm guns on the upper deck
with the central wood and steel tower supporting a radar scanner
dish.
There was one other marine structure in the area at the time
was also considered by many to be one of the 'pirate' towers.
This was Gunfleet
and was a kind of lighthouse, looking like a water tank on
stilts - not dissimilar to one of the single sections of the
Army forts. The
forts were not a popular posting and were abandoned wholesale
by the military at the end of the war after which ownership
became a matter of opinion as they were generally considered
to be situated in international waters and not subject to
any particular mainland jurisdiction. In fact, the War Office
seemed to be rather keen to pass responsibility for them onto
other government departments having tried, unsuccessfully,
to sell them off in 1963. This
didn't really matter, of course, as they were doing no harm
and were of no real practical use to anyone - until pirate
radio came along!
|
|
By an extremely questionable
interpretation of an obscure passage in the Geneva International
Convention of the Sea, 1958, which was ratified in September 1964
by the British government in an Order in Council:
'The ( Thames ) estuary
may be considered as a bay if the area of water within the bay exceeds
that in a semi-circle drawn, with a 24 mile baseline, across the
indentation in the coast'
|
... and another
debatable decision which considered sandbanks visible only
during unusually low tides at certain parts of the year to
be part of the British mainland, all of the towers, except
Roughs and Sunk Head, were declared to be inside territorial
waters and therefore subject to prosecution under the Wireless
and Telegraphy Act. The area of water in the bay, 683 square
miles as calculated by a Ministry of Defence naval surveyor,
was only 5 square miles more than that inside the theoretical
semi-circle!
The last military maintenance teams were withdrawn from the
towers in the winter of 1958/59 and by the Sixties all the
offshore towers were already in a state of considerable neglect
and disrepair, offering at best only a bare minimum of facilities
and were to prove impossible to supply for long periods during
bad weather.
This is part of a description of Shivering Sands, which was
the home of RADIO CITY. The fort had lost one of its towers
when a ship ran into it, killing four people:
". . .
one section had collapsed and another was standing all alone
where the walkways had collapsed."
|
|
|
|
Also, being in
open sea areas and constructed largely of metal, they were
natural lightning conductors. On Red Sands, D.J. Paul Beresford
of RADIO 390 was actually struck by lightning, not only surviving
but managing to broadcast his usual programme only hours later!
Even on good days huge build-ups of static electricity were
apparently a problem and there are many recounted tales of
station staff being thrown some distance after carelessly
grabbing metal door handles. Minor things like that, however,
didn't seem to be any deterrent to the more determined pirate
radio station operators. The planned final destruction of
the towers commenced on 21st August 1967 when a team of 20
Royal Engineers demolished
the upper sections of Sunk Head using 2200lbs of explosives,
in front of a specially invited audience of television and
press reporters, with a blast that could be seen both from
the Radio Caroline ship and by Roy Bates on Roughs tower six
miles away. During 1967 Roy Bates had declared the platform,
which is supported by 75ft concrete pillars, to be an 'independent
nation' named Sealand and proclaimed himself monarch.
|
|
Later that year
the Royal Navy attempted to remove him from the structure
but abandoned the attempt when they were met with warning
shots fired from the tower. Following this incident legal
action was brought against him by the government but was subsequently
dropped when the courts ruled that they had no jurisdiction
outside British territorial waters. During 1978 Sealand was
invaded by some Germans who then proceeded to claim ownership
of the fort. Roy launched a counter-offensive, capturing a
German prisoner in the process which necessitated the German
Embassy to send an envoy to negotiate his release. 'King'
Roy and 'Queen' Joan still occupy the site periodically
and have put considerable effort into having its independence
internationally recognised. This cause was dealt a blow in
1987 when the U.K. extended its territorial waters from 3
miles to 12 miles. Their current claim depends on whether
it can be legally established that its independency was recognised
before that date, in which the 1967 court ruling seems to
lie in their favour.
|
|
Roy
of Sealand proclaimed the Constitution of the Principality on 25th
September 1975. Gradually, items of national identity were produced
such as the flag of the Principality of Sealand, a national anthem,
stamps and its own currency - gold and silver coins designated as
Sealand Dollars. 'Official passports' for the Principality of Sealand
were issued to people who had, in some way, helped the birth of
Sealand but were never at any point for sale.
In August 1978, a number of Dutchmen employed by a German businessman
arrived at Sealand, ostensibly to discuss potential business dealings.
In Roy's absence they kidnapped his son Michael and took Sealand
in a coup d'etat. Roy recaptured Sealand with his own 'troops' and
imprisoned the usurpers as prisoners of war, during which time the
governments of both Germany and The Netherlands petitioned for their
release. They did ask England for diplomatic intervention but were
turned down, with the British government explaining that they made
no claim on the territory and citing the court decision as reason
for their refusal. The others had no choice but to recognise Sealand's
sovereignty and Germany even went so far as to send a diplomat to
negotiate for the release of the German 'prisoner'.
The Dutch prisoners were the first to be released under the Geneva
Convention which requires the release of all prisoners when a state
of war does not exist. The sole German continued to be held as,
at some stage, he had apparently accepted a Sealand passport and
was technically guilty of the crime of treason. Prince Roy, in the
interests of Sealand's reputation, eventually released the man without
charge.
On 1st October 1987 Britain extended the limit of its territorial
waters from 3 nautical miles to 12, but had been beaten to the punch
by Roy who, the previous day, had declared his own extension of
Sealand's territorial waters to a similar distance to ensure that
access to Sealand could not be blocked by British territorial waters.
To date, no official agreement has been signed between Sealand and
Britain regarding the resulting overlap in claimed jurisdiction
but a general policy of dividing the area between the two countries
down the middle has been unofficially followed. International law
does not allow the claim of 'new' land by the simple extension of
sea rights and so Sealand's sovereignty was still guaranteed. Under
this law, neither 'country' can claim rights to any part of the
nother that falls within its 'new' boundary and it is to its credit
that Britain has made no further attempts to take Sealand but still
treats it as an independent State. Following a ruling by the DHSS,
Prince Roy pays no British National Insurance during the time he
spends on Sealand.
There was another incident involving firearms in 1990 when warning
shots were fired at a ship that had strayed too near Sealand. The
crew of the ship subsequently made formal complaints to the British
authorities but, despite Britain's severe prohibition of firearms,
the government chose not to pursue the matter indicating that the
Home Office still considers Sealand to be outside their umbrella
of control.
During 1997, a number of forged Sealand passports started turning
up across the world, some of which were apparently used to open
bank accounts in various countries under false names. Less than
300 official genuine pasports were in existence therefore it was
unlikely that the items would be detected as forgeries due to the
fact that hardly anyone had ever seen one. The source was eventually
traced back to the same the same German who had unsuccessfully attempted
to take Sealand by force.
He had created an unofficial 'Sealand Business Foundation' that
allegedly sold over 150,000 fake passports before being found out,
resulting in the curious facty that there are now probably 500 times
as many forged Sealand Passports in circulation than official ones.
Apparently, a large number of the passports were being sold to people
leaving Hong Kong during the Chinese reoccupation for a dollar each.
During
early 2000 Spanish police brought action against criminals that
had set up a website selling fake Sealand 'passports' which are
suspected of having been used by illegal arms and drug-dealing rings.
One of these fake 'passports' was also encountered by police investigating
the murder of fashion mogul Gianni Versace.
The current government of the Principality of Sealand states that
"The Principality of Sealand recognises 'jus gentium' and has undertaken
to regulate any activity with a view to compliance with 'jus gentium'
and international law or to have it regulated." The acceptance and
recognition of the Principality as an independent state, or country,
has been demonstrated frequently over the last thirty years by both
European and other States, but particularly Britain, which has stated
unequivocably on a number of occasions that it has no jurisdiction
within Principality territorial limits or that it takes no interest
in events occuring within the jurisdiction of the Principality.
In addition, many legal experts have carefully examined the arguments
for and against Sealand sovereignty and have agreed with unanimity
that 'jus gentium' applies as the basic principle of law supporting
Sealand's independence.
Due to failing health, Prince Roy has more recently reviewed the
arrangements that have been in place for decades and, looking towards
the future of the Principality, appointed his son, Prince Michael,
the Prince Regent as 'Sovereign pro tempore' by Royal Decree in
1999.
In
June of 2000 an Anguillan-based company called HavenCo announced
preliminary plans to locate its servers and satellite uplinks on
the Sealand platform provided its independent status could be validated.
That
company now exclusively leases offices and operations centres in
Sealand, where it offers, and is able to offer, unparalleled security
and independence to users who wish to take advantage of its Internet
colocation services. The purpose of this is to allow companies using
its servers to avoid the government scrutiny which will be made
possible by laws to be taken up by the U.K. and U.S.A. although
HavenCo insist that it will not allow any form of illegal trading.
Sealand, of course, has no laws regarding the control of data traffic.
I await further developments with interest. . . . .
More
and larger pictures of the pirate forts may be found in my Image
Gallery and there are some fabulous pages in pirate links
|